Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Issue 2, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 1, Volume 11, 2023
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Issue 12, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 11, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 10, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 9, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 8, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 7, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 6, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 5, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 4, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 3, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 2, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 1, Volume 10, 2022
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Issue 12, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 11, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 10, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 9, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 8, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 7, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 6, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 5, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 4, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 3, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 2, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 1, Volume 9, 2021
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Issue 12, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 11, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 10, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 9, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 8, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 7, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 6, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 5, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 4, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 3, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 2, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 1, Volume 8, 2020
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Issue 12, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 11, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 10, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 9, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 8, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 7, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 6, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 5, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 4, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 3, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 2, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 1, Volume 7, 2019
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Issue 12, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 11, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 10, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 9, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 8, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 7, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 6, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 5, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 4, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 3, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 2, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 1, Volume 6, 2018
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Issue 12, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 11, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 10, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 9, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 8, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 7, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 6, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 5, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 4, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 3, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 2, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 1, Volume 5, 2017
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Issue 20, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 19, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 18, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 17, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 16, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 15, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 14, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 13, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 12, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 11, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 10, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 9, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 8, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 7, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 6, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 5, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 4, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 3, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 2A, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 2, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 1, Volume 4, 2016
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Issue 12B, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 12A, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 12, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 11, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 10A, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 10, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 9, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 8, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 7, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 6, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 5, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 4, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 3, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 2, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 1, Volume 3, 2015
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Issue 12C, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 12B, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 12A, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 11A, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 12, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 11, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 10, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 9, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 8A, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 8, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 7, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 6, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 5, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 4, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 3, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 2, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 1, Volume 2, 2014
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
Issue 12, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 11, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 10, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 9, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 8, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 7, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 6, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 5, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 4, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 3, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 2, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 1, Volume 1, 2013
American Journal of Educational Research. 2014, 2(12), 1230-1236
DOI: 10.12691/EDUCATION-2-12-16
Original Research

A Corpus-Based Study on Epistemic Adjectives in Academic English

Reyhan Ağçam1,

1School of Foreign Languages, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey

Pub. Date: December 21, 2014

Cite this paper

Reyhan Ağçam. A Corpus-Based Study on Epistemic Adjectives in Academic English. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(12):1230-1236. doi: 10.12691/EDUCATION-2-12-16

Abstract

‘Stance is the way academics annotate their texts to comment on the possible accuracy or creditability of a claim, the extent they want to commit themselves to it, or the attitude they want to convey to an entity, a proposition or the reader’ (Hyland, 2005). Recent studies have revealed that researchers, particularly those who study soft sciences, tend to adopt a certain stance while reporting on their research even though they are supposed to use an objective voice in their academic writing. The present study aims to investigate epistemic adjectives used in conveying author stance in Academic English through a corpus-based approach. It reports the results of the Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis (Granger, 1996) administered to a total number of 136 doctoral dissertations written by native and non-native academic authors of English. Frequencies of the epistemic adjectives were separately calculated for each corpus and a log-likelihood test was utilized to see whether native and non-native academic authors of English significantly differ with regard to these items. Findings of the study have shown that certainty adjectives were mostly used by non-native academic authors of English whilst likelihood adjectives were mostly employed by native academic authors of English, which leads us to the conclusion that the non-native groups are inclined to use cautious expressions less frequently than the native groups in their academic writing. The study concludes with possible reasons for this particular result, implications of the results to academic writing and a few suggestions for further research.

Keywords

academic writing, contrastive interlanguage analysis, epistemic adjective, stance

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Ädel, A. (2010). Using corpora to teach academic writing: Challenges for the direct approach. In M. C. Compoy-Cubillo, B. Belles-Fortuno& M. L. Gea-Valor (Eds.), Corpus based approach to English language teaching (pp. 39-54).
 
[2]  Baker, P., Hardie, A., &McEnery, T. (2006). A glossary of corpus linguistics. Edinburg: Edinburg.
 
[3]  Biber, D. &Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9, 93-124.
 
[4]  Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
 
[5]  Conrad, S. &Biber, D. (2000). Adverbial making of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston and G. Tompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text, 56-73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
[6]  Gabrielatos, C. & McEnery (2005). Epistemic modality in MA dissertations. In Fuertes Olivera, P.A. (Ed.),Lengua y Sociedad: Investigacion e srecientes en lingüísticaaplicada (pp. 311-331). Lingüística y Filología, 61. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
 
[7]  Gosden, H. (1990). Discourse functions of subject in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 56-75.
 
[8]  Granger, S. (1996). From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg, & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in contrast. Lund: Lund University Press, 37-51.
 
[9]  Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.
 
[10]  Kafes, H. (2009). Authorial stance in academic English: Native and non-native academic speaker writers’ use of stance devices (modal verbs) in research articles. PhD Thesis, Anadolu University.
 
[11]  Kanté, I. (2010). Head nouns as modal stance markers –academic texts vs. legal texts. Enonciation et rhetorique dansl’ecrit scientifique, Lidil 41, 121-135.
 
[12]  MacIntyre, R. (2010). How do they stand? Research into the representation of stance in academic writing and its implications for pedagogy. Sophia University Faculty of Liberal Arts, 19-32.
 
[13]  Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary (2000). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
[14]  Salager-Meyer, F. (1997). I Think that Perhaps You Should: A Study of Hedges in Written Scientific Discourse. In Miller, T. (Ed.), Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. English Language Programs: United States Information Agency, 105-118.
 
[15]  Scott, M. (2012). WordSmith Tools version 6, Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
 
[16]  Skelton, J. (1988). Comments in academic articles. In P. Grunwell (Ed.), Applied Linguistics in Society: British Studies in Applied Linguistics 3. 98-108. London: Centre for International Language.
 
[17]  Stubbs, M. (1986). A matter of prolonged field work: notes toward a model grammar of English. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 1-25.
 
[18]  Ventola, E. & Maureanen, A. (1990). Research and Writing in English. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.